The car can be considered in a progression of Time. Move anywhere on that car and you are fine, or even jump to the next car. It is all right so long as you move to anything moving at the same progression. But try and step off that car while it is moving and you are left in the dust. The car speeds out of sight. Your world has gone. You are now in a different progression. From the point of view of those in the cars, the person effectively vanished. But he did not vanish into another Space. Merely into another Time. He is still on the road of our space. But far back in a different progression of Time.
All of this is not fanciful theorizing. Evidence to support it was slowly accumulating. Einstein postulated that a curvature of space would cause even light to bend through it— an electromagnetic wavelength that traditionally follows straight lines. Maverick idea. But in 1919, during a total eclipse, Sir Arthur Eddington detected a change in a star’s position. Einstein seemed to be right: space was curving around the planet, and light was being bent. He was indeed earning the words on his doctorate: “for adding significantly to the body of theoretical physics. . .” Relativity was not specifically mentioned, as nobody was sure what that was.
So it seemed space indeed was curving around masses in Space. But if light was affected, it seemed too that other energy wavelengths might be affected. After all, light is only an electromagnetic wavelength. If light was curving, then it was slowing. Might the same be true of the tempo of things within that space? Then if Time and Space were continuous, if Time was the equilibrium between mass and space (as I like to put it), might it then also be true of that greatest mystery— Time? Would all things move, exist, decay, at a tempo in ratio to space and mass?
The cornerstone of Einstein’s Relativity was, of course, E=MC2 —that is, energy equals mass times the speed of light squared. It is actually a simple equation, but its ramifications are monumental and universal. It means that there is an incredible amount of energy in any object, if we could just get at it in the nucleus of its atoms. If this could be verified, it would seem to mean that Relativity’s basic tenants of space and energy being relative in certain equations would be one step closer to fact.
By the nuclear detonations at Alamogordo, New Mexico, July 16, 1945, E=MC2 would be proved. A chain reaction in the uranium atom caused the greatest explosion man had ever known. The atomic age had dawned.
As the space age dawned, further proof came of Einstein’s concept of the continuity of Time and Space. Atomic clocks placed at orbital heights recorded time passing just slightly faster than those at sea level. Where gravity, and hence within a curvature of space, was greatest Time moved more slowly; where it was not, more quickly. The passage of Time as we record and experience it here was actually slower than in space.
Mass— such as this planet— did seem to bend space before it, and with this it did seem to slow Time. Fractionally, granted. But it finally opened the labyrinth of Time to logical conquest. Time, of course, does not exist. It is the name we give to the equilibrium of Mass and Space; it is the resultant tempo at which all matter is set relative to that curvature of space. Therefore if gravity is not alone the result of a curvature of space, it must be the result of that and energy wavelengths interacting by being bent into proximity in that curvature of space. That is how, presumably, it sets the tempo of all matter.
So long as we remain in that curvature of space all seems routine. We walk along. Cars speed by. There is no bending of space by this acceleration. We can move about freely. No level of acceleration can free us of our slice of this curved space. Not even the thrust of a spaceship zooming into orbit. It is fighting the Earth’s gravity. Yet if it could bend space around it and set up its own curvature (warp) of space and gravitational field, all things aboard would be oriented to the spaceship. There would be no awareness of our planet’s gravity. There would need to be no commensurate tempo of mass and energy aboard with ours on the planet.
Theoretically, it was proposed the greater the curvature of space, the more time would be slowed. But if the Earth could only slow time fractionally by its massive size and speed through space, what “on Earth” or anywhere else could bend space even more to significantly affect the progression of Time? If gravity was not a curvature of space, but an interlocking of yet-unknown or misunderstood wavelengths created by or intensified by the degree of curving space, could not such wavelengths be bent “artificially”? If the tempo of all things lay along energy, which is inherent in all mass, could not bending or changing the electromagnetic frequencies of energy also bring about the same effect as an object bending space around it? There must be other methods to bend electromagnetic wavelengths than curving space.
But in considering this, we leave off the world of Time alone. Time is not a dimension, as it is popularly conceived. It is not the 4th dimension. It is an equilibrium of the 3 dimensions we live in. Nothing accelerated to the speed of light is in another dimension. A car hurling at us at the speed of light would still mow us down. Time comes with us. It is not a separate space. That wonderful equilibrium of Mass and Space, and hence all the energy tempo within it, comes with our space.
A “Space Warp” is very different than a time warp. Space warp is the cause: time warp is the result. When people speak of “time warps” they usually mean “dimensional exchange.” Is it possible there are other dimensions? That there are alter worlds and coexisting universes?
We must first begin with the atom, any atom. There are only a little over 100 types of atoms in all the Universe that we know of. All that we see is built out of these and out of a combination of these. All atoms are made up of protons, electrons and neutrons, except hydrogen which has no neutron. No atom is different than the other except in number: Helium, Calcium, Titanium, Lead, whatever; they are all the same thing. . . except in number. They follow an orderly mathematical progression. Hydrogen, the simplest atom, has 1 proton in the nucleus and 1 electron in orbit. Helium has 2; 3 protons in the nucleus and 3 electrons in orbit is no longer a gas; it is Lithium, a silver-white metal. It goes on and on to Seaborgium, with 106 protons in the nucleus.
Therefore, the difference between all matter must be the electromagnetic energy created by the different number of these charged particles and their relationship, not in the basic make up of these particles as individuals. The reason Nitrogen and Oxygen are such different gases cannot be that Nitrogen has 7 protons and 7 electrons and that Oxygen has 8 of each; it must be in the different amount of electromagnetic energy that one proton and one electron make in relation to the other charged particles in the nucleus and in orbit.
The difference is not in the makeup of the particles, but in the space between the particles in orbit (electrons) and the nucleus (protons). That space is the substance of everything. That space is electromagnetic energy. That space is “reality.” That space is the atom. Electromagnetism is the substance of everything. In essence, that “space” is the substance of all structure. That space is energy.
Understanding the structure of all matter is fundamental to appreciate the limitless potential of manipulating or warping electromagnetism, since by doing so you are capable of affecting the very energy that creates all things. This is far superior to the mere splitting of the nucleus of a complex atom. That only provides a violent form of energy. Within the electromagnetic force of the atom is the key to everything: creation, transmutation . . .limitless power.
Single atoms of five common elements: Hydrogen; Carbon; Nitrogen; Oxygen; and Iron. Not only does the varying number of protons in the nucleus and the varying number and system of orbits of electrons make one substance different from the other, the proximity of one type of atom to another creates an unlimited array of substance.
Water molecule H2O. In other words, 2 atoms of hydrogen and 1 atom of Oxygen. Two gases combine to make a liquid. It is not a material difference: the protons are still protons, the electrons still electrons. Electromagnetic energy has been affected by the proximity of these charged particles making up the atoms. A new substance is created.
To give you an idea of how limitless the potential of what these atoms can create, here is an atomic formula: C3032 H4812 N780 Fe4 O872 S12
Do you know what this formula is? It is the complex molecule known as hemoglobin, the stuff that makes the red blood cell red. Put those many atoms of each substance— three thousand and thirty two atoms of carbon, four thousand eight hundred and twelve atoms of hydrogen, seven hundred and eighty atoms of nitrogen, four atoms of iron, eight hundred and seventy two atoms of oxygen, and twelve atoms of sulfur together in the right order and you have a very powerful, almost thinking device. But it is something so tiny one needs a high powered microscope in order to see it. The speed with which the red blood cell carries out its complex functions is incredible. The complex data it carries is even more mindboggling. Its communication with the miniscule receptors in the bodily tissues is equivalent to writing the Gettysburg address on the point of a pin while passing that pin at the speed of a missile.
Radioactive decay. The means by which one elements becomes another. The isotope Uranium 238 (92 protons and 146 neutrons in its nucleus) is unstable, meaning it sheds these particles from its nucleus. Doing so, the vital loss of these protons and neutrons changes it to another substance: a lesser complex one. In this decay chain Uranium changes eventually to common and stable Lead.
The loss of these particles obviously means the change in the electromagnetic force of the atoms in question. Losing some of its 92 protons requires that it shed the equal number of electrons. It becomes a less complex atom eventually such as lead, where the process stops. Transmutation is the result of the electromagnetic energy changes. In this we can see the power contained in the electromagnetic forces that bind the atom, created by the various particles, their systems of orbit and their number.
Most substances, fortunately, aren’t like Uranium 238. They are stable and do not decay. But the example of radioactive decay shows us the power of changing the electromagnetic energy of any atom. If we could do so, then we could effectively carry on any form of transmutation we want.
The atom is often likened to a “mini solar system, most of it space.” It is always surprising to realize that this is true, that the structure of the atom is energy in a confined space between revolving charged particles. Since everything is made of atoms, everything in this Universe is mostly energy, not materially particulate. The electrons, protons and neutrons are only a small part of the atom. It is the space between them that is, ironically, the “substance;” space in this case filled with electromagnetic energy.
Therefore all matter is not only mostly energy, it is mostly space. Remove the space from it, and you have very little. Remove the space from a wall and the combined particles might not even form a pellet the size of a 12 dpi period. In other words, take the space out of everything and what you have left isn’t much.
If all is mostly space, why can’t one substance pass freely through another? Go ahead and run to a wall. You won’t go through. It’s been tried. It doesn’t work. Why? There are a number of reasons. There is a collision of forces, but those particles are still there. And at the tremendous speeds they travel, they basically make the atom a “solid.” Imagine a ball circling a pole so fast that it appears a hazy doughnut. As far as our eyes are concerned it is a solid. But since it is impossible for us to move faster than that speeding ball, it would seem to our touch to be a solid too. It is going so fast we will meet with impact if we walk within the sphere of that revolving ball. To our perception it has become a solid space. Now imagine many balls revolving around that pole. You get the idea. It has become a solid, not just from the forces of circling air but from the speed of the solid balls. The only way to pass through is to slow those speeds down and bide one’s time.
The atom is different in that it is generating energy. This energy is mutually interactive. But what would happen if we slowed the atom down or even better changed the frequency of the atoms? It is not possible to break the forces. . .or is it?
For example, an electric current is nothing more than electron particles traveling along in the same direction, usually along a wire. These are the same very tiny particles that make of the key elements of every atom: they are the ones whose tremendously speedy revolutions around the atomic nucleus, and by their number and their speed, help to create the energy of each substance.
If I were to take 1,000,000 volts of high frequency electricity (at 60 cycles alternating current) and pass it through my body to ground there is no question I would look like Ramses’ mummy in short order. I would be instantly killed. The trillion, trillions, countless trillion and giga trillions of electrons would destroy my whole body. . . Remember, 1 ampere measurement of electric energy is equal to 63.3 billion billion electrons per second at any given point of the current. That’s a lot of electrons in 1 million volts of high frequency electricity!
But change the frequency of that electricity. Change it to 65,000 cycles, and you can channel that 1 million volts through your body and out your fingertips like lightning . . . if metal thimbles are provided to allow a point of discharge. No? . . .Yes, very true.
The question was put to science long ago. In 1952, Dr. Irwin A. Moon, director of the Moody Institute of Science, demonstrated the reality of it, as have others. I use his example here since he was actually using it in terms of what we would today call a space warp or dimensional exchange.
Dr. Moon captured channeling 1,000,000 volts of electricity
through his body. He is standing on the conductor.
The same particles that make up any wall (anything period), Dr. Moon channeled through his body. The electrons passed through harmlessly. What he did was merely to change the frequency. Could this be a clue to another Universe passing freely through us if its atoms were not mutually interactive with ours? The 1950s was full of such talk, as we were entering the exciting age of the atom and all the new knowledge on the structure of the Universe it gave us. But Dr. Moon’s example above is only the tip of the iceberg.
The key to “dimensional exchange” may play along the same lines. But it becomes far more complex here, far more even than Time. The particles that Dr. Moon passed through him more or less traveled along his exterior and even if passing through him literally they would have done so like any electric current travels along a wire. The electrons basically hip hop along the atoms of the material along which they are conducting. It’s like the atoms were playing a fast hand of pass the hot potato. It’s a conveyer belt of electrons moving within the orbits of the atoms. Thus they can move through an insulated wire. They are moving through the “space” of the atom and thus moving through a “solid” material, like copper. But the electrons are not moving through the nucleus.
Electrons are still particulate matter, and, more importantly, so are the protons and neutrons in the atomic nucleus. A change of frequency affects how electrons conduct along a current. It does not make them invisible or impermanent, so that something can pass through them. The electrons are not passing through other electrons and certainly they are not passing through the nucleus. Thus changing the frequency will not remove the particulate matter. The protons and electrons remain.
We’re back to the example of someone stepping off those speeding cars and effectively vanishing from the point of view of those in the cars. The man who stepped off (let’s make it a man) is still in our space. But he is traveling in the “future.” Although he is not traveling at the speeds of the cars, he is traveling in a faster progression of Time because he is not in as severe a curvature of space. So, ironically, though he is not moving at the speeds of the car, he is moving in Time faster. That is, Time is merely bypassing the cars.
It’s the old “space ship to Sirius” analogy. A space ship traveling the speed of light to the star Sirius, which is 9 light years away, would increase its mass to such an extent it would bend space sufficiently to slow Time within its field. It’s just a more intensified example of what the Earth does with space. A round trip would take 18 light years. From the perspective within the spacecraft about a day has gone by, but when the astronauts stepped off the spaceship, now back at home, they would be shocked to see that 18 years had elapsed. They really didn’t travel into the future. It merely continued on with us. Thus increasing the speed/mass and severity of the curvature of space around anything will slow the progression of Time within its sphere. Thus the man left along the roadside, though he is not traveling, he is progressing faster in Time.
But the space is still our space. We can still collide. What is the doorway to other dimensions, if so they exist? How can something completely vanish and have no perceptible contact with our world?
Changing the frequency in atoms is hard to envision. The result is probably what is seen in the work of John Hutchison— fusion, transmutation, even invisibility. But what can render particulate matter— protons, electrons, neutrons, etc., no longer solid?
It is easier to imagine another system of atoms that are not mutually interactive with ours. Could there not be another whole world? Like adjusting the position of a hologram card, would another whole scene emerge? Another whole world of atoms and planets? One thing is common to all the Universe: to all reality— electromagnetic energy in vortex kinesis. Can the atom be the doorway to another world?
It is hard to contemplate the concept of another dimension of 3 dimensions. The particulate structure of the atom is quite a bulwark. No change in the frequency of the atom will remove the particles. If there is another dimension all about us, we are completely unaware of its particulate structure. But what about pathways to different worlds within our own dimension? What about wormholes and other such mind-boggling concepts? Are there ways to get to other worlds within our own Universe by a warping of Space?
A hurricane is example of the effects of an energy vortex on the force fields of this Earth. Gravity anomalies have been reported recently. These should not surprise anyone considering the vast swirling energy of a hurricane is centered at its imploding vortex core.
Unlike all the atmospheric energy required to start and maintain a hurricane or tornado, magnetic vortices are the result of changes and shifts within the magnetic field of the Earth, deep within its mantel and core.
The recent invention of Dr. Evgeny Podkletnov certainly underscores the potential of a natural magnetic vortex. His device was created at Tampere University Labs, Finland, in 1996. It was nothing more than a superconductor (12 inch diameter) sealed inside an outer metal casing filled with liquid nitrogen. The superconductor was set over three solenoids to magnetically levitate it and start it spinning. The liquid nitrogen in the outer casing was to keep it cool while this superconductor ring spun at several thousand RPM.
The phenomenal result was accidentally discovered. One of the assistants’ pipe smoke wafted over the device while it spun at 5,000 rpm. The smoke straight away went to the top of the room where it hovered. It was discovered that gravity had been slightly shielded over the device. In essence, a spinning magnetic field (vortex) affected the most mysterious force field of gravity. Dr. Podkletnov discovered via measurements that there was a funnel of less gravity 12 inches diameter above the machine going through each floor of the building and possibly then out into space. When spun to 25,000 rpm, the device took off on its own.
This alarming relationship of gravity to a spinning magnetic field opens the door for future discussions of Time and Space. Is there a way to tap into such wavelengths or vortices in Space and speed to another point in space or to a planet without increasing mass and thus without affecting Time? Such power must be found. Such pathways must be considered. Every part of our fibre is spinning with energy. Every part of this planet. But we move about within 3 dimensions unaware of it, without affecting Time or Space. We are smaller versions of the Universe. We must find a way to move about it along unobstructed pathways. Even the solar system is tempered by the heliosphere— the gravitational field of our sun. The “void of space” in our solar system is a lie. The Sun exerts massive influence. It is interesting to note that when Pioneer 10, Pioneer 11 and Ulysses left the solar system, the last NASA could detect of them was “an incomprehensible acceleration.” They left the gravitational pull of the Sun, and in the smooth ocean of wavelengths in intergalactic space they took off. How fast does light travel out there? How fast does Time flow or slow? We must find similar pathways within our own system. Vortex kinesis shows us the way. It shows all energy in mass is spinning. Therefore we can appreciate the wavelengths, like light, that do not. We can find the pathways that don’t fit in to the continuum to which vortex kinesis contributes. Blueprints are light that. They also show us what is not in the pattern.
Vortex kinesis is the clue. It tells us how energy and mass interact. What can a vortex do? Can it warp space? Can it open doors? Where can it lead? Only time will tell. . .